Is the institution recognized?
We check that the university is recognized by the education authority of its own country and is not a degree mill with an official-sounding foreign name.
An international background check follows a person through every country where they have lived, studied or worked, and reads the records each country actually keeps. We plan the sources country by country, search every spelling of the name, and verify foreign degrees and employers at the source.
An international background check verifies a person's identity, career, companies, disputes and media history in each country of their past, using that country's registries, courts and press. Coverage differs by country, so the scope is planned per jurisdiction, with every name variant searched. Single-country add-ons take from 10 business days; multi-country checks up to about a month.
The same question has a different answer in every jurisdiction: some publish company officers and court judgments openly, some restrict them, and criminal records are almost always released only through official channels.
| Record | What varies between countries | What it means for your check |
|---|---|---|
| Company registries | Whether officers and shareholders are public, whether history and dissolved companies are kept, whether access is free | Directorships can be mapped fully in some countries and only partly in others |
| Court records | Whether judgments are published, searchable by name, or published with parties' names removed | A "no cases found" result means different things in different places |
| Insolvency | Personal and corporate gazettes, retention periods and search tools | Older bankruptcies may drop out of public view |
| Criminal records | Usually released only to the person or to authorized employers through an official certificate | OSINT finds reported cases; the certificate route is separate |
| Media | Language, script, archive depth and how often names are abbreviated in reporting | Searches run in the original script as well as in English |
The report states, for each country, what was searched and what could not be reached from open sources, so a clean result is never mistaken for a complete one. This is the core difference from the domestic background check scope.
One person can appear under several spellings, name orders and scripts. Every variant has to be searched, and every hit tied back to the subject before it is reported.
Matches are then confirmed with independent identifiers, such as date of birth, a registered address, a company role or a photograph, so a common name in one country does not become someone else's lawsuit in your report.
Foreign credentials are checked at their source: the institution, its official verification channel and the employer's own registry record, not a scanned certificate or a reference phone number.
We check that the university is recognized by the education authority of its own country and is not a degree mill with an official-sounding foreign name.
Confirmation comes from the institution or its official verification service. In the UK, for example, Hedd lets employers confirm a graduate's institution, award and dates, and keeps a list of bogus institutions (Hedd). Many registrars require the graduate's signed consent.
The company's registry entry, filings, website history and press show whether it was trading during the dates on the CV and was large enough for the role claimed.
Team pages, press releases, publications and public filings that name the person in that role, in the original language.
Employment verification →The plan comes from the person's timeline. Each country gets its own list of sources and its own note on what open sources cannot show.
Personal data about the subject may cross several borders on its way to you, and each crossing needs a lawful basis and, where it leaves the EU or the UK, a transfer mechanism.
We agree at scoping where the report will be held, who receives it and which transfer basis applies, and keep the content to what the decision needs. This is a summary, not legal advice.
When the subject is a company with owners in several countries rather than one person, the work moves into due diligence or, for regulated onboarding, KYC and AML checks; both sit within our wider OSINT services for cross-border work.
Tell us the countries and years involved, what you are deciding and by when. We reply with a country-by-country scope, a delivery date and a fixed quote. Urgent delivery is possible for a 50% surcharge.
Yes. An international background check plans sources for each country and period: registries, courts, insolvency records, regulators and media, plus the employers and schools on the CV. Four countries usually means a comprehensive check of up to about a month; a single country added to an existing check takes from 10 business days. The quote fixes the date.
We search every likely romanization and the original script, with name-order and middle-name variants. Each hit is then tested against independent identifiers, such as date of birth, a registered address, a company role or a photo. Anything that matches only by name is either excluded or reported clearly as unconfirmed.
Usually. We check whether the education authority of that country recognizes the institution, and look for signs of a degree mill. The award itself is confirmed by the registrar or an official verification service, which often needs the graduate's signed consent, so plan to ask him for it early.
Criminal records generally come through official channels, usually a certificate the person requests or an authorized employer check, and OSINT cannot replace them. What we can find is reported criminal cases, court judgments where courts publish them and regulatory actions. We list which certificates you would need, country by country.
Identify the lawful basis for the check, then the transfer basis for each move out of the EU: an adequacy decision where one applies, otherwise standard contractual clauses or another Chapter V safeguard. Limit what goes to the parent to what its decision needs, and tell the candidate. Your data-protection officer should sign this off.
Not necessarily clean. In some countries judgments are not published, or are published with parties' names removed, and older cases may not be online. Our report says, for each country, what was searched and what open sources cannot reach, so you can decide whether a lawful official request is worth making.
Sources checked 8 October 2026. Figures about third-party firms and tools are as published by them or by the cited source on that date.