Job postings and team changes
New roles, locations and skills show what a company is building and where.
OSINT business intelligence turns what competitors, partners and markets publish about themselves into answers your strategy team can use. Job ads, tender awards, patent filings, registry changes and permits show where a company is heading months before a press release does.
OSINT business intelligence is the analysis of public information about markets and companies, such as registries, job postings, public tenders, patents, regulatory filings, trade data and media, to support commercial decisions. It shows who the players are, what competitors are building and who is worth partnering with or buying. OSINT-S does it without pretexting or trade secrets, and sources every finding.
Competitive intelligence is useful when it is tied to a decision. Most projects start from one of four.
| Decision | Typical question | Where the answer usually sits |
|---|---|---|
| Enter a new market | Who already sells here, who owns them, and who regulates the sector? | Registries, licensing bodies, tender databases, trade press |
| Respond to a competitor | Is the rival building a new product line or moving into our region? | Job postings, patent applications, permits, new subsidiaries |
| Choose a partner or distributor | Which candidates are solid, and which have conflicts or a poor record? | Company records, litigation, customers named in tenders, media |
| Screen an acquisition target | Is the target's story about customers, growth and technology credible? | Procurement awards, patents, hiring trends, filings, archived websites |
We push for the decision at scoping. "Tell us everything about Competitor X" produces a thick file nobody reads; "Will Competitor X bid for public contracts in our region next year?" produces an answer.
No single signal is conclusive. Combined, hiring, procurement, patents, filings and permits give a reliable view of what a company is doing.
New roles, locations and skills show what a company is building and where.
Who bids, who wins, at what scale and with which partners, from national and supranational procurement portals.
Technical direction and co-applicants, read with the publication delay in mind.
New subsidiaries, joint ventures, changes of officers, charges and capital increases in each country.
Planning applications, environmental permits and import records that reveal a new plant, warehouse or supply route.
Conference talks, product documentation, website changes, regulatory submissions and trade press interviews.
Brand protection →Different signals arrive at different times. Reading them together, with their delays in mind, is what turns data into foresight.
| Signal | What it shows | Timing caveat |
|---|---|---|
| Job postings | Capabilities being built now | Often the earliest signal; ads can be speculative or reused |
| Registry filings | New entities, partners, capital | Filed after the decision, sometimes with a statutory delay |
| Permits and planning | Physical expansion | Usually months ahead of operation; may never be built |
| Tender awards | Customers and contract values | Published after award; shows the past year's wins |
| Patent applications | Research direction | US applications are generally published promptly after 18 months from the earliest filing date, and applicants who do not file abroad can ask for nonpublication (35 U.S.C. §122) |
A patent shows where a competitor was heading a year and a half ago; a hiring spike shows where it is heading now. The useful analysis is where they agree.
A market entry brief maps the players, owners, regulators and routes to market in a country you are about to enter, so you plan with facts, not assumptions.
Before entering a new country, companies usually need the same answers: who the established competitors are and who owns them, which distributors serve the sector, how public contracts are awarded and to whom, which licenses are required, and which players have politically exposed owners. Registries, licensing bodies, tender portals and trade press cover most of it.
When the political environment itself is the question, the brief connects to geopolitical risk intelligence. When a shortlist of partners emerges, the strongest candidates move into due diligence before contracts are drafted.
Screening a long list of partners or targets with OSINT narrows it to the few worth meeting, and flags problems before they cost a negotiation.
Corporate development teams often start with twenty names and the time to meet five. A screening pass checks each candidate's ownership, size, public customers, litigation, technology and reputation, and ranks them against your criteria. The deeper ownership questions for the shortlist belong to company investigations.
The same method supports acquisition work: whether the target's named clients appear in procurement records, whether its engineering team matches the technology it claims, and whether public reviews by former staff and customers describe the business the way the deck does.
We collect only what is lawfully public. We do not misrepresent who we are, induce anyone to breach confidentiality or handle trade secrets.
In practice: no pretext calls or fake recruiter approaches, no fake profiles to join closed groups, no hacking, no leaked or stolen documents, and no debriefing of a competitor's current or former staff about confidential matters. Personal data, for example in employee profiles, is used in aggregate and in proportion, in line with the GDPR and UK GDPR (GDPR).
Five steps, from a decision-focused question to a reviewed brief, with an option to keep watching afterwards.
One-off briefs take from 10 business days to about a month. Competitors you need to follow continuously can be tracked on an hourly-updated, analyst-reviewed platform.
A focused brief takes from 10 business days; a multi-country landscape up to about a month. Urgent work costs 50% more, and if we miss the agreed date, the fee goes down. Work is confidential, under NDA if you need one. For a continuing watch on named competitors, OSINT monitoring tracks filings, tenders, hiring and media. Teams that want to build this skill in-house can use OSINT training.
Open sources show what companies do in public. They will not replace customer research, market sizing panels or confidential data.
If you need to know what customers think, commission surveys or interviews conducted openly. If you need precise market share, syndicated industry data is often better. If the answer only exists in a competitor's private pricing sheets or board papers, we will not obtain it, and we will tell you so at scoping rather than return a guess.
Business intelligence also works best alongside the rest of our OSINT services for strategy and deal teams: a landscape brief often feeds a partner shortlist, and a shortlist feeds due diligence.
Tell us what you are deciding, which companies and countries matter and your deadline. We reply with the questions we would answer, a delivery date and a fixed quote.
Often it can show the direction. We look at their job postings by role and location, new subsidiaries or branch registrations, permits for sites, distributor agreements visible in trade press, and tenders they bid on. Together these usually show whether a move is real, its likely scale and timing. We report it as a likelihood with the evidence, not as certainty.
A focused brief on one country typically takes from 10 business days, and a multi-country landscape up to about a month. It covers the main competitors and their owners, distributors, licensing requirements, recent public contract awards and winners, and players with political exposure. Candidates you want to partner with can then go into due diligence.
No. Posing as a customer to extract information is misrepresentation, and we do not do it. We can analyze prices a competitor publishes, prices disclosed in public tender awards, and what their filings reveal about revenue and margins. If the answer only exists in confidential documents, we tell you that at scoping.
We would not. A former employee usually owes a duty of confidentiality to the previous employer, and asking about a roadmap risks trade secret misappropriation claims for you and him. Talk to your counsel about what he may share. Our work relies on public sources such as patents, job ads, filings and published statements.
Yes. A screening pass checks each target's ownership, hiring trends, customers named in public sources, product footprint, litigation and reputation against criteria you set, then ranks them with short reasons. The shortlist can go straight into deeper company investigations or due diligence once talks begin.
It is still worth it, for the right question. US applications generally publish after 18 months, so patents show research direction and co-applicants rather than next quarter's launch. Pair them with hiring data and conference talks, which move faster, and the combination shows which research is turning into product.
It can be, with care. Public professional profiles are personal data under the GDPR, so the collection needs a legitimate purpose, should be limited to what the question needs, and is best reported in aggregate, for example team sizes and skills by location, rather than as dossiers on individuals. We do not join closed groups or use fake profiles.
Sources checked 7 October 2026. Figures about third-party firms and tools are as published by them or by the cited source on that date.