Have we seen this before?
Indicators from your alert compared with public reporting, so the team knows the playbook it is facing.
OSINT incident response support answers the questions your forensic team cannot see from inside the network: what the attacker is running elsewhere, whether your data or access is being offered, and who is already talking about the incident. We work to your incident lead's priorities and rules, from the first call to the lessons-learned review.
OSINT incident response is open-source intelligence work run alongside forensics during a cyber incident. It checks attacker infrastructure and campaign context, verifies leak claims, watches criminal channels and public discussion, and reports to the incident lead in short, labeled updates. It does not touch your systems or the attacker's; it explains the outside view so containment, communication and recovery decisions rest on facts.
NIST now frames incident response through the CSF 2.0 Functions. Outside-in intelligence feeds the Detect, Respond and Recover stages and the lessons learned afterward.
NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 maps incident response to the six CSF 2.0 Functions: Govern, Identify and Protect cover preparation, while Detect, Respond and Recover cover the incident itself. Two of its outcomes describe this work directly: "Cyber threat intelligence and other contextual information are integrated into the analysis" (DE.AE-07) and "Information is shared with designated internal and external stakeholders" (RS.CO-03). The publication also notes that third parties may be contracted to help perform incident response (NIST SP 800-61r3).
| Stage | Question from the incident lead | OSINT output |
|---|---|---|
| Detect | Is this alert part of a known campaign? | Campaign and kit context, related indicators, likely next steps |
| Respond | How big is this outside our network? Is anything published? | Infrastructure scope, leak-site and channel checks, claim verification |
| Respond: communication | Who is talking about us, and what are they saying? | Summary of researcher, media and criminal-channel discussion for comms and counsel |
| Recover | Is the attacker coming back or selling our access? | Watch on new infrastructure, access offers and credential dumps |
| Improve | What should change before the next one? | External exposure that helped the attacker, written up for the lessons-learned review |
Six questions most incident leads ask in the first three days. Each one has an open-source answer that does not wait for forensic imaging.
Indicators from your alert compared with public reporting, so the team knows the playbook it is facing.
Leak sites, forums and channels checked for your name, sample files or an access sale.
Data breach investigations →Exposed services, leaked staff credentials and look-alike domains that match the forensic timeline.
Other victims of the same campaign, which helps size the threat and coordinate with peers or your ISAC.
Researcher posts, journalists' questions and social media chatter, so statements are not overtaken by events.
Known group, alias or toolset, with a confidence level.
Threat actor profiling →Collection must not alert the attacker or leak the incident. Findings are labeled so everyone knows how far they may travel.
Agree the paperwork and the seed data in a quiet week, so collection can start within hours of a call.
Short timed updates during the incident, a consolidated report afterward and evidence kept in a form counsel and insurers can use.
During the incident you receive short updates at the agreed rhythm, each with findings, confidence and a TLP label. Small questions, such as whether a group has posted your name, can sometimes be answered within a business day; a consolidated report for the lessons-learned review follows from 10 business days. Urgent delivery costs 50% more, a senior analyst reviews every update, the fee is fixed after written scoping and goes down if we miss the agreed date.
Many organizations route incident support through breach counsel; ask yours how that affects instructions and reporting. Personal data in leaked material is minimized and handled under the GDPR and similar rules. The wider toolkit, infrastructure pivoting, attribution and ransomware support, sits in our OSINT cyber investigations service; if the trail leads to a staff member, the case moves to an insider threat investigation with HR and legal. Incident support is one of the OSINT services for security teams we provide.
Send your incident lead's first questions and the indicators you can share. We confirm scope, timing and a fixed fee in writing.
It adds the outside view while forensics works inside: whether the group has posted your name or samples, what its usual playbook looks like, which infrastructure it is using and whether your access or data is being offered elsewhere. Work starts once scope and the first questions are agreed in writing, and small questions can sometimes be answered within a business day. Updates go to your incident lead, labeled with TLP.
Lookups run from separate, non-attributable environments, never from your network or named accounts, and most of the work uses passive sources such as registration, certificate and historical DNS data that the attacker cannot see being queried. We do not visit attacker panels, message the group or upload your samples to public scanning services without approval. If an action could be noticed, we ask the incident lead first.
Every finding we deliver carries a TLP label agreed with your incident lead, so it is clear what can go to the ISAC, to suppliers or nowhere. We can prepare a separate sharing version with internal details stripped, typically labeled TLP:GREEN for community sharing. Your counsel still decides what is released; we simply make the shareable version easy to approve.
Both work, but a retainer saves the first day. With an NDA, scope, activation contacts and your baseline of domains, brands and suppliers agreed in advance, collection can start within hours of a call. Without one, we first need those basics in writing. A short tabletop exercise with your team is the easiest way to test the arrangement.
Check the policy and ask the insurer or breach counsel before adding anyone. Panels often cover forensics and negotiation but not outside-in intelligence, and many insurers accept additional providers when they are approved in advance. Our work does not touch your systems, so it rarely overlaps with the panel firm. We coordinate through your incident lead or counsel so nothing is done twice.
Sources checked 10 October 2026. Figures about third-party firms and tools are as published by them or by the cited source on that date.