Approaches to your staff
A recruiter offers your engineers a lucrative role and asks them to install a test project or move to a chat app. We check whether the recruiter and the hiring company exist.
Social engineering assessment →A LinkedIn profile OSINT investigation answers one practical question: is the person behind this profile real, and is the career it describes true? It covers recruiters who contact your staff, people listing your company as their employer, candidates you are about to hire and executives across the table in a deal.
A LinkedIn profile OSINT investigation checks whether a profile belongs to a real person and whether its claims hold up: photos, employment history, education, connections and activity are tested against company registries, court records, press, publications and other independent sources. OSINT-S reviews public profiles manually, respects LinkedIn's terms and grades every conclusion by confidence.
When a decision or a security risk rests on a profile: an approach to your staff, a hire, a partnership or a profile that misuses your company's name.
A recruiter offers your engineers a lucrative role and asks them to install a test project or move to a chat app. We check whether the recruiter and the hiring company exist.
Social engineering assessment →Profiles listing your firm as employer, often used to look credible in scams or to approach your clients. We identify which are fabricated and how they are used.
Executive impersonation →Remote applicants whose profile, photo and history may be borrowed or invented. We test identity signals before the offer, within employment-screening rules.
Remote candidate verification →An executive, adviser or investor whose profile lists exits, board seats and degrees. We check the claims that matter for your decision against independent records.
Executive background checks →Single signs are weak; fabricated profiles show several at once, and the strongest evidence comes from outside LinkedIn.
| Signal | What we check | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Profile photo | Whether the image belongs to someone else or shows traits of AI generation | Strong when the original owner is found |
| Employment history | Whether the employers exist and the dates fit registries, press and the employer's own site | Strong |
| Connections | Whether contacts are real colleagues or a cluster of similar new profiles | Moderate |
| Activity and age | A recent profile with little history but a senior title | Supporting only |
| Wording | Text copied from other profiles or job ads | Moderate |
| Footprint elsewhere | Publications, talks, patents, filings, a consistent email and username | Strong when present and consistent |
An absence of footprint is not proof of fraud: many real professionals keep a low profile. We report what was found, what was missing and what would settle the question, such as a direct reference check through a verified company channel.
We take the claims your decision depends on and test each against a record created independently of the person who made it.
A profile is self-published. A director appointment shows up in a corporate registry, a disputed exit in court filings, a research career in publications and patents, a senior banking role in regulators' registers. When the record and the profile disagree, the gap and its likely explanation go into the report: a title inflated, dates stretched, an employer that never traded, or a harmless mismatch.
If the findings will be used to decide on a US job applicant, the Fair Credit Reporting Act's consent and notice rules can apply (FTC), and that work runs as employment verification. Deeper checks on a business partner belong to due diligence.
LinkedIn blocks most fake accounts automatically and now requires workplace verification for some titles, but neither confirms a whole career. Its terms also restrict scraping, and we respect them.
Fake profiles using your brand can be reported to LinkedIn; our evidence pack is organized for that and for repeat cases handled through fake social media account removal.
We confirm the purpose of every request first and decline work that targets a private person for personal reasons.
A short answer, then the evidence for each claim checked, graded by confidence. Focused checks take from 10 business days.
You receive a one-page answer (real or not, claims confirmed or not), a claim-by-claim table with sources and dates, captures of the public material relied on, and open questions with the step that would resolve each. A single urgent recruiter or candidate check can sometimes be done in a business day; checks on a group of fake employee profiles or an executive's full career take from 10 business days, and complex cross-border cases up to about a month.
A senior analyst reviews every report. The price is fixed after written scoping, urgent delivery costs 50% more, and the fee goes down if we miss the agreed date. Profile checks often sit alongside email address and X account investigations, and among the other OSINT services for HR and security teams.
Share the profile link, how the person reached you and what you need to decide. We confirm the purpose and reply with scope, timeline and a fixed price.
Often within a business day. We check whether the photo belongs to someone else, whether the hiring company exists and actually employs the recruiter, whether the profile and its connections are recent and clustered, and whether the job ad was copied. Until the answer arrives, ask your developers not to run the test file. If the approach is fake, we document it for a report to LinkedIn and your security team.
We compare each profile with your staff list, check photos for reuse or generation, look at creation patterns and connections, and see what the profiles are doing: contacting your clients, advertising fake jobs or lending credibility to a scam site. You get a list graded as fake, likely fake or real but unknown, with evidence organized for reporting to LinkedIn.
Yes, within employment-screening rules. We test whether the photo, name, employment history and education are consistent with independent records and with each other, and whether parts of the profile were borrowed from someone else. If you are hiring in the US and will use the findings in the decision, FCRA consent and notice rules can apply, so we scope that with you first.
We check each claim against records created independently: corporate filings and press for the exits, the fund's own publications and registries for the board seat, and court records for disputes. Mismatches are reported with their likely explanation, because not every gap is deception. A focused check on one person takes from 10 business days; a full background with several jurisdictions takes up to about a month.
No. LinkedIn's User Agreement prohibits scraping and false identities, and in hiQ v. LinkedIn a federal court read the agreement as clearly barring scraping and found that creating false identities breached it. We review public profiles manually, for a defined lawful question, and never create fake profiles or send connection requests under a false identity. For lawful market and competitor research, our competitive intelligence work uses public filings, publications and other open sources instead.
That is the right way to ask it. We can check whether the employer and role on the profile are consistent with independent records and whether the photo belongs to someone else, and give you a yes, no or unclear answer. We do not provide home addresses or a personal dossier. For romance-scam concerns, our dating profile check is built for this kind of question.
Sources checked 9 October 2026. Figures about third-party firms and tools are as published by them or by the cited source on that date.